no-www.org Should You Participate?
This question has arrived at my feet a few times now.
Sould I participate with https://no-www.org/ and remove support for www. on my sites?
The answer is no you shouldn’t whilst I appreciate and do belive www. has become deprecated, a LOT of end users still use www. So by removing support for this you are excludinga potentialy large user base from reaching your website, can you as a business afford to do that … of course not!
So what should you do?
In my opinion, add support for both.
You will see that https://blog.oneiroi.co.uk and https://blog.oneiroi.co.uk BOTH work, this allows both “classes” of end users to reach my website, and I have applied this principle to all sites I have recently worked on.
Example httpd.conf entry
ServerName blog.oneiroi.co.uk ServerAlias blog.oneiroi.co.uk
DNS for blog.oneiroi.co.uk is an A record to the IP of my webhost and blog.oneiroi.co.uk is a CNAME of blog.oneiroi.co.uk
This method however does not https://no-www.org/ validate as www. subdomain still exists, so don’t expect a “no-www” validated image to appear on my blog anytime soon.
www. may be depreciated, but businesses can not afford to exclude any potential customers, so don’t expect this no-www to become standard anytime either.
“July 2, 2008
Today we passed 38,000 domains validated through no-www. This is a nice round number so it seems worthy of tooting our horn over. ”
As I write this there are 77,343,623 active domains (source: https://www.domaintools.com/internet-statistics/) making the no-www support less than 0.05% of active domains.
I would be intrested to know how many of this 38k domains are actual businesses, and how support no-www has affected thier online sales.
I can tell you however of the 300 or so domains I currently controll, non would no-www validate as they are all configured using the method above.